SOURCE WATCH

Change what you vouched for, and everyone sees it.

A company that vouches for its data hosts the list itself. Source Watch keeps a fingerprint of that list every time it is read. Swap one line, take one away, or pull the file down, and the change is sealed, dated and shown here for good.

Check a companySee the change logPut a company on notice

1

sources being watched

1

files reading correctly

0

files not right

0

notices sealed

Check a company

The file is read at /.well-known/sebbi-source.json on the company's own domain. What is found is reported as found.

What shows up

SWAPPED

The same label now points at different data.

WITHDRAWN

Data the company vouched for is no longer on its list. The Input Gate refuses it.

FILE GONE

A file that was hosted has been taken down.

FILE NOT RIGHT

The file is there and is broken: wrong domain, bad fingerprints, two things under one label, dates in the future.

The public change log

Every source being watched has kept its word since it was first read.

Each line is sealed in the block shown. Check the chain yourself, free. Machine-readable: /x/sourcewatch/log

Put a company on notice

What a company knew, and when, decides what it should have done. This writes a formal notice telling a company that a free, published way to check its AI inputs and records exists, names the rules that apply, and asks four questions with 28 days to answer. The wording and the date are sealed, so neither can be disputed later.

You send it yourself, from your own email. A company answers by any published method: it says how its records can be checked at /.well-known/independent-check.json on its own domain, and that answer is shown on its page.

For companies

Host one file and you are on the watch list with a clean record from day one. It is free. Become a verified source

Put the gate in front of your own AI so nothing unvouched gets in: the Input Gate, free for 7 days, then 50p per agent per month.

Questions

Can a company quietly change what it vouched for?

Not without it showing. A company that vouches for its data hosts the list on its own domain, so it could edit the list later. sebbi.pro Source Watch keeps the fingerprint of every source file each time it is read. When a file changes, the change is worked out line by line, sealed, timestamped into Bitcoin and shown in public: a label that now points at different data is marked SWAPPED, data taken off the list is marked WITHDRAWN, and a file that disappears is marked FILE GONE. The Input Gate refuses data its source has withdrawn.

How do I put a supplier on notice about its AI records?

Write to it, and seal what you wrote. At sebbi.pro/source-watch you type the supplier's web address and get a formal Notice of an Available Method: it tells the company that a free, published way to check AI inputs and records exists, names the rules that measure conduct against what can reasonably be done, and asks four questions with 28 days to answer. The wording and date are sealed and timestamped into Bitcoin. You send it from your own email. From that day the company cannot say it was not told.

Why does a sealed notice matter?

Because what a company knew, and when, decides what it should have done. Data protection law asks for every reasonable step and for measures that take account of the state of the art; the EU AI Act asks where data came from. A notice that can be proved to the day removes the answer 'we were not aware a check was possible'.

Can a company change what it vouched for? · How to put a supplier on notice · Input Gate · The Independent Check Rule · Terms

AI news
WiredChina’s Nvidia Honeypot Isn’t Surprising. Jensen Huang Fell for It Anyway22mTechCrunchDatabricks’ new AI agent tells CEO Ali Ghodsi the unvarnished truth52mArs TechnicaGoogle DeepMind just mathematically verified key parts of Signal1hTechCrunchPlurai wants to help AI agents work better using the same approach that helped get self-driving cars to roads1hThe VergeAdobe’s AI experiments let you walk around in photos and interview your characters1hBBC NewsNew Indian mega library rocked by scandal over 'AI-generated books'4hWiredA 13-Year-Old Asked AI About Suicide on Her School Laptop. It Didn’t Get Flagged for Weeks4hTechCrunchNvidia’s crisis has corporate governance experts reaching for the popcorn8hBBC NewsNvidia hires major US law firm to investigate alleged Chinese spy affair17hArs TechnicaRing cameras go mobile as Amazon debuts AI-powered security drone and robot17hArs TechnicaGrok Build coding agent leaks oodles of confidential info, some belonging to SpaceXSI18hTechCrunchOpenAI acquires Odessia, travel startup created by Sonder founder18hTechCrunchOpenAI, Anthropic face new oversight as New York’s AI safety law takes effect19hArs TechnicaWhat happens to mathematics when AI becomes an oracle?19hThe VergeThe US is winning the AI race. Jensen Huang could have blown it20hThe VergeChatGPT is getting verified AI ‘Business Agents’21hBBC NewsClaude chatbot maker set for $1.3tn stock market debut despite 'catastrophic' AI warning21hThe VergeThe indie game community is in disarray over AI and Big Walk22hThe VergeAnthropic has its own AI-powered office suite now22hArs TechnicaDeepMind reveals Gemini Robotics 2.5 and open safety benchmark "ASIMOV-jailbreak"1dWiredThis New Linux-Based Desktop Operating System Is Built for AI Nerds1dWiredTear Down Those Guardrails! Meet the Renegades Freeing Chatbots From Corporate Enslavers1dWiredThe AI Safety Debate Has Lost the Plot. We Asked 10 Experts What the Real Nightmares Are1dBBC NewsFaisal Islam: What the boss of US tech giant Nvidia told me about China and national security1dWiredChina’s Nvidia Honeypot Isn’t Surprising. Jensen Huang Fell for It Anyway22mTechCrunchDatabricks’ new AI agent tells CEO Ali Ghodsi the unvarnished truth52mArs TechnicaGoogle DeepMind just mathematically verified key parts of Signal1hTechCrunchPlurai wants to help AI agents work better using the same approach that helped get self-driving cars to roads1hThe VergeAdobe’s AI experiments let you walk around in photos and interview your characters1hBBC NewsNew Indian mega library rocked by scandal over 'AI-generated books'4hWiredA 13-Year-Old Asked AI About Suicide on Her School Laptop. It Didn’t Get Flagged for Weeks4hTechCrunchNvidia’s crisis has corporate governance experts reaching for the popcorn8hBBC NewsNvidia hires major US law firm to investigate alleged Chinese spy affair17hArs TechnicaRing cameras go mobile as Amazon debuts AI-powered security drone and robot17hArs TechnicaGrok Build coding agent leaks oodles of confidential info, some belonging to SpaceXSI18hTechCrunchOpenAI acquires Odessia, travel startup created by Sonder founder18hTechCrunchOpenAI, Anthropic face new oversight as New York’s AI safety law takes effect19hArs TechnicaWhat happens to mathematics when AI becomes an oracle?19hThe VergeThe US is winning the AI race. Jensen Huang could have blown it20hThe VergeChatGPT is getting verified AI ‘Business Agents’21hBBC NewsClaude chatbot maker set for $1.3tn stock market debut despite 'catastrophic' AI warning21hThe VergeThe indie game community is in disarray over AI and Big Walk22hThe VergeAnthropic has its own AI-powered office suite now22hArs TechnicaDeepMind reveals Gemini Robotics 2.5 and open safety benchmark "ASIMOV-jailbreak"1dWiredThis New Linux-Based Desktop Operating System Is Built for AI Nerds1dWiredTear Down Those Guardrails! Meet the Renegades Freeing Chatbots From Corporate Enslavers1dWiredThe AI Safety Debate Has Lost the Plot. We Asked 10 Experts What the Real Nightmares Are1dBBC NewsFaisal Islam: What the boss of US tech giant Nvidia told me about China and national security1d