sebbi.pro
EU AI Act / Definitions
EU AI Act · Article 3

Key definitions

The terms that decide whether and how the Act applies to you, in plain English.

AI system Article 3(1)

A machine-based system designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy, that may adapt after deployment, and that infers from the input it receives how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments.

Risk Article 3(2)

The combination of the probability of an occurrence of harm and the severity of that harm.

Provider Article 3(3)

Anyone who develops an AI system or general-purpose AI model, or has one developed, and places it on the market or puts it into service under their own name or trademark, whether for payment or free.

Deployer Article 3(4)

Anyone using an AI system under their authority, except in a personal non-professional activity.

Authorised representative Article 3(5)

An EU-based person mandated in writing by a non-EU provider to carry out its obligations under the Act on its behalf.

Importer Article 3(6)

An EU-based person who places on the market an AI system bearing the name or trademark of someone established outside the EU.

Distributor Article 3(7)

Anyone in the supply chain, other than the provider or importer, who makes an AI system available on the EU market.

Operator Article 3(8)

A provider, product manufacturer, deployer, authorised representative, importer or distributor.

Placing on the market Article 3(9)

The first making available of an AI system or general-purpose AI model on the EU market.

Putting into service Article 3(11)

Supplying an AI system for first use directly to the deployer, or for own use, in the EU for its intended purpose.

Intended purpose Article 3(12)

The use for which the provider intends the AI system, including the context and conditions, as set out in its instructions, promotional material and technical documentation.

Reasonably foreseeable misuse Article 3(13)

Use not in accordance with the intended purpose, but which may result from reasonably foreseeable human behaviour or interaction with other systems.

Safety component Article 3(14)

A component of a product or AI system that fulfils a safety function, or whose failure endangers the health and safety of people or property.

Substantial modification Article 3(23)

A change after market placement, not foreseen in the initial conformity assessment, that affects compliance or changes the intended purpose. It makes the modifier a provider.

Post-market monitoring system Article 3(25)

All activities by providers to collect and review experience from AI systems they have placed on the market, to identify any need for corrective or preventive action.

Training data Article 3(29)

Data used to train an AI system by fitting its learnable parameters.

Biometric data Article 3(34)

Personal data from specific technical processing of a person's physical, physiological or behavioural characteristics, such as facial images or fingerprints.

Emotion recognition system Article 3(39)

An AI system for identifying or inferring emotions or intentions of people from their biometric data.

Remote biometric identification system Article 3(41)

An AI system for identifying people, without their active involvement, typically at a distance, by comparing biometric data with a reference database.

Serious incident Article 3(49)

An incident or malfunction of an AI system that directly or indirectly leads to death or serious harm to health, serious and irreversible disruption of critical infrastructure, infringement of fundamental rights obligations, or serious harm to property or the environment.

Deep fake Article 3(60)

AI-generated or manipulated image, audio or video content resembling existing people, objects, places, entities or events that would falsely appear to a person to be authentic or truthful.

General-purpose AI model Article 3(63)

An AI model, including one trained on large data with self-supervision at scale, that displays significant generality and can competently perform a wide range of distinct tasks, and can be integrated into many downstream systems.

High-impact capabilities Article 3(64)

Capabilities that match or exceed those of the most advanced general-purpose AI models.

Systemic risk Article 3(65)

A risk specific to the high-impact capabilities of general-purpose AI models, with significant impact on the EU market due to their reach or actual or foreseeable negative effects on public health, safety, security, fundamental rights or society, that can spread at scale.

General-purpose AI system Article 3(66)

An AI system based on a general-purpose AI model that can serve a variety of purposes, used directly or integrated into other systems.

AI literacy Article 3(56)

Skills, knowledge and understanding that let providers, deployers and affected people make informed use of AI systems and be aware of the opportunities, risks and possible harm.

AI regulatory sandbox Article 3(55)

A controlled framework set up by a competent authority that lets providers develop, train, validate and test innovative AI under supervision for a limited time.

Real-world testing plan Article 3(53)

A document describing the objectives, methodology, geographical, population and temporal scope, monitoring, organisation and conduct of testing in real-world conditions.

Plain-English summary by sebbi.pro of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744. The official text is the only authoritative version: EUR-Lex.

AI news
TechCrunchGrok releases the first seven minutes of its AI-generated ‘Odyssey’10hTechCrunchAI delivers ‘zero financial payoff’ to most companies, Apollo economist says14hTechCrunchThe hottest AI wearables and gadgets you should know about17hThe Verger/opensource just banned AI, non-English speakers, and more18hThe VergeGoogle’s AI search changes upended online publishing19hThe VergeBlue Planet III is keeping the rough edges in the age of AI1dTechCrunchThe AI graveyard: a running list of projects and startups that didn’t make it1dThe VergePennsylvania will require labels on AI-generated ads1dTechCrunchForced to pick, Grok’s AI model chooses Republicans. OpenAI’s picks Democrats.1dWiredThe PHP Meltdown Shows How AI Makes Bugs More Exploitable1dBBC NewsUK to invest £100m in 'world first' AI Biosecurity Lab2dThe VergeOpenAI now trains its frontier AI models with no internet access2dBBC NewsThe Indian workers filming their work to train AI2dTechCrunchGrok releases the first seven minutes of its AI-generated ‘Odyssey’10hTechCrunchAI delivers ‘zero financial payoff’ to most companies, Apollo economist says14hTechCrunchThe hottest AI wearables and gadgets you should know about17hThe Verger/opensource just banned AI, non-English speakers, and more18hThe VergeGoogle’s AI search changes upended online publishing19hThe VergeBlue Planet III is keeping the rough edges in the age of AI1dTechCrunchThe AI graveyard: a running list of projects and startups that didn’t make it1dThe VergePennsylvania will require labels on AI-generated ads1dTechCrunchForced to pick, Grok’s AI model chooses Republicans. OpenAI’s picks Democrats.1dWiredThe PHP Meltdown Shows How AI Makes Bugs More Exploitable1dBBC NewsUK to invest £100m in 'world first' AI Biosecurity Lab2dThe VergeOpenAI now trains its frontier AI models with no internet access2dBBC NewsThe Indian workers filming their work to train AI2d